Would you like to consult us? Feel free to contact us online! Virtual Appointments

Our Blog
5 minutes read

Understanding Comparative Negligence in Motorcycle Accidents

Published by Mark Brynteson

Motorcycle accidents often result in serious injuries or fatalities, primarily due to the exposed nature of the ride. When it comes to determining liability and compensation in these accidents, comparative negligence plays a crucial role.

This tort principle is also referred to as comparative fault. It can significantly affect the outcome of insurance claims and legal proceedings. This article delves into the intricacies of comparative fault in the context of motorcycle accidents. We will examine its determination, impact on compensation, and considerations for affected parties.

Comparative Negligence: A Primer

Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine used to allocate responsibility and damages among parties involved in an accident. A percentage of fault is based on their respective contributions to the incident. Unlike the traditional all-or-nothing approach, where the party at fault bears all the liability, comparative fault recognizes that multiple parties can share responsibility for an accident.

Types of Comparative Negligence Systems

Jurisdictions typically adhere to one of two main comparative negligence systems:

  • Pure Comparative Negligence:

Pure comparative fault allows a damaged party to recover even if they are 99% at fault. However, the percentage of fault reduces the recovery amount.

  • Modified Comparative Negligence:

Modified comparative fault limits recovery to situations where the damaged party is less at fault than the opposing party. The limit is commonly capped at 50% or 51%.

The specific rules and thresholds vary by state. This makes it crucial for motorcycle accident victims to understand the applicable laws in their jurisdiction.

What is Contributory Negligence?

Four states, Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia, as well as the District of Columbia, are contributory negligence states. In a contributory negligence state, if you hold even a minimal amount of responsibility for your own injury, this rule bars recovery of damages from the other parties involved.

Understanding Modified Comparative Negligence in Illinois

Illinois provides a specific example of the modified comparative fault system in action. Under Illinois law, specifically 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, the state adheres to a modified comparative negligence standard. This means that an injured party in a motorcycle accident (or any other type of accident) is eligible to recover damages only if they are found to be less than 50% at fault.

If the injured party’s fault reaches 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any compensation from other at-fault parties. This rule underscores the importance of accurately establishing and proving fault in accident cases within Illinois. Fairly determining the degree of fault directly impacts the victim’s ability to recover damages.

Determining Who is at Fault in a Motorcycle Accident

Determining fault in motorcycle accidents involves a detailed investigation into the circumstances surrounding the accident. This process includes examining police reports, witness statements, traffic camera footage, and any other available evidence. Factors such as speeding, failure to yield, and distracted driving are evaluated to ascertain each party’s degree of fault.

Challenges Unique to Motorcycle Accidents

Motorcycle riders often face inherent biases that can influence the determination of fault. Stereotypes about reckless riding behavior can skew perceptions, potentially leading to an unfair distribution of blame. Overcoming these biases requires solid evidence that clearly demonstrates the biker’s adherence to traffic laws and safe riding practices.

Impact on Compensation Claims

The application of comparative fault significantly impacts the compensation that motorcycle accident victims can receive. For instance, if a motorcyclist is found to be 30% responsible for an accident, their compensation for damages (medical bills, lost wages, etc.) will be reduced by 30%. This reduction underscores the importance of accurately establishing fault in these accidents.

Navigating Insurance Negotiations

Insurance companies play a pivotal role in the aftermath of motorcycle accidents. They often conduct their own investigations to determine fault and are known to leverage comparative fault to minimize payouts.

Negotiating with insurers can be challenging. They may attempt to attribute a higher degree of fault to the motorcyclist to reduce the claim amount. This may be related to how serious the injuries are and how costly the claim becomes.

Strategic Considerations

Given the complexities involved in comparative negligence laws, there are several strategies that motorcyclists should consider to protect their interests:

  • Gather Comprehensive Evidence:

Immediately collecting evidence at the accident scene, including photos, videos, and witness contact information, can be instrumental in establishing fault.

  • Seek Legal Representation:

An experienced personal injury lawyer can provide invaluable guidance through the claims process. They assist with everything from gathering evidence to negotiating with insurers.

  • Understand Local Laws:

Familiarity with the specific comparative fault rules in your jurisdiction is crucial for setting realistic expectations about the potential outcome of your claim.

The Importance of Legal Counsel

Navigating the comparative fault landscape requires a nuanced understanding of legal principles and their application to motorcycle accidents. An experienced motorcycle accident attorney can offer critical insights into the determination of fault. They will also advocate on your behalf during insurance negotiations, and ensure that your rights are fully protected.

Legal Advocacy in Action

A skilled lawyer will carefully review all available evidence, consult with accident reconstruction experts if necessary, and build a compelling case to minimize your fault percentage. This advocacy is vital, especially in contested cases where the allocation of fault is not straightforward.

Legal representation not only helps in navigating the complexities of comparative fault but also significantly increases the likelihood of securing fair and just compensation. If you or someone you care about is involved in a motorcycle accident, understanding your rights is imperative. Seek professional guidance as soon as possible. This can help ensure a favorable outcome.

Recent Posts

contact us today!

Questions? We Can Help

See what our clients have to say...

Client Testimonials

I have known Mr. Brynteson for many years. I first met him in a social setting at a men's prayer group, then later had the privilege to use him professionally on several occasions. Mr. Brynteson has set up two non-profit corporations that I am a part of in record time. His competence, speed of action and knowledge in the area was astounding! I believe that Mr. Brynteson has the integrity that he would not take on any case in which he feels he could not do an exceptional job for his client. I certainly could recommend this gentlemen and am privileged to publicly give him a 5 star rating.

— Dr. Jacob Caraotta

When I finally called Mark Brynteson after being mired in a nasty situation for several months, Mark immediately took charge and directed every reponse on my part. He explained the problems clearly from a legal standpoint and also provided options when they were available. One day when I was quite sick and flat on my back, Mark called to follow up on a problem. When he finished, he said, "Today I'm not on the clock". Under the circumstances, that consideration was highly appreciated.

— Len Salvig

We have found Mark Brynteson to give both informed and researched advice. After using several different lawyers, we now go directly to Mark for our legal issues. Having had such a good experience I would highly recommend his services. We will continue to rely on Mark for all of our future legal needs.

— Dr. Jay Nelson

Get In Touch

Contact Us Today!

Mark D. Brynteson has been practicing law for over 35 years. Let him put that experience to use for you.

I believe the law is about the people and we fight for our clients every step of the way. Contact me and I will review your case for free. Call today! Or feel free to fill out the contact form to the right and I’ll get in touch with you soon!